ignorance of law - definition. What is ignorance of law
Diclib.com
قاموس ChatGPT
أدخل كلمة أو عبارة بأي لغة 👆
اللغة:

ترجمة وتحليل الكلمات عن طريق الذكاء الاصطناعي ChatGPT

في هذه الصفحة يمكنك الحصول على تحليل مفصل لكلمة أو عبارة باستخدام أفضل تقنيات الذكاء الاصطناعي المتوفرة اليوم:

  • كيف يتم استخدام الكلمة في اللغة
  • تردد الكلمة
  • ما إذا كانت الكلمة تستخدم في كثير من الأحيان في اللغة المنطوقة أو المكتوبة
  • خيارات الترجمة إلى الروسية أو الإسبانية، على التوالي
  • أمثلة على استخدام الكلمة (عدة عبارات مع الترجمة)
  • أصل الكلمة

%ما هو (من)٪ 1 - تعريف

STATE OF NATURE WHERE INDIVIDUALS DETERMINE THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIETY IGNORANT OF THEIR POSITION
Veil of ignorance; Rawls' veil of ignorance; Veil of Ignorance; Veil of ignorance (philosophy); Veil Of Ignorance
  • A visual depiction of philosopher John Rawls' hypothetical veil of ignorance. Citizens making choices about their society are asked to make them from an "original position" of equality ''(left)'' behind a "veil of ignorance" ''(wall, center)'', without knowing what gender, race, abilities, tastes, wealth, or position in society they will have ''(right)''.  Rawls claims this will cause them to choose "fair" policies.

Invincible ignorance (Catholic theology)         
Invincible error; Invincible ignorance; Invincibly ignorant; Affected ignorance; Invincible ignorance (Catholic theology); Vincible ignorance; Invincible and vincible ignorance
Invincible ignorance is used in Catholic moral theology to refer to the state of persons who are, through no fault of their own, ignorant of the fact that the Christian message is true. It is the opposite of the term vincible ignorance.
Vincible ignorance         
Invincible error; Invincible ignorance; Invincibly ignorant; Affected ignorance; Invincible ignorance (Catholic theology); Vincible ignorance; Invincible and vincible ignorance
Vincible ignorance is, in Catholic moral theology, ignorance that a person could remove by applying reasonable diligence in the given set of circumstances. It contrasts with invincible ignorance, which a person is either entirely incapable of removing, or could only do so by supererogatory efforts (i.
Invincible error         
Invincible error; Invincible ignorance; Invincibly ignorant; Affected ignorance; Invincible ignorance (Catholic theology); Vincible ignorance; Invincible and vincible ignorance
An invincible error is, in Christian philosophy, a normally sinful action which is not considered sinful because it was committed through blameless ignorance that one's actions were harmful or otherwise prohibited.'Error' in Catholic Encyclopedia

ويكيبيديا

Original position

The original position (OP), often referred to as the veil of ignorance, is a thought experiment used for reasoning about the principles that should structure a society based on mutual dependence. The phrases original position and veil of ignorance were coined by the American philosopher John Rawls, but the thought experiment itself was developed by William Vickrey and John Harsanyi in earlier writings.

In the original position, you are asked to consider which principles you would select for the basic structure of society, but you must select as if you had no knowledge ahead of time what position you would end up having in that society. This choice is made from behind a "veil of ignorance", which prevents you from knowing your ethnicity, social status, gender and, crucially in Rawls' formulation, your or anyone else's idea of how to lead a good life. Ideally, this would force participants to select principles impartially and rationally.

In Rawls's theory the original position plays the same role that the "state of nature" does in the social contract tradition of Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and John Locke. The original position figures prominently in Rawls's 1971 book, A Theory of Justice. It has influenced a variety of thinkers from a broad spectrum of philosophical orientations.

أمثلة من مجموعة نصية لـ٪ 1
1. Updated: Friday, January 13, 2006 at 2031 hours IST New Delhi, January 13: Bringing Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in its line of fire, BJP on Friday demanded the dismissal of Law Minister H R Bhardwaj and countermanding by CBI of government’s statement before British authorities that there was no evidence to link funds in two frozen bank accounts of Italian businessman Ottavio Quattrochi and Bofors pay–offs. «For having defied the law and for having interfered with in its due process, the Law Minister has not merely shown his ignorance of law but chosen to indulge in its flagrant violation.