Geben Sie ein Wort oder eine Phrase in einer beliebigen Sprache ein 👆
Sprache:
Übersetzung und Analyse von Wörtern durch künstliche Intelligenz ChatGPT
Auf dieser Seite erhalten Sie eine detaillierte Analyse eines Wortes oder einer Phrase mithilfe der besten heute verfügbaren Technologie der künstlichen Intelligenz:
- wie das Wort verwendet wird
- Häufigkeit der Nutzung
- es wird häufiger in mündlicher oder schriftlicher Rede verwendet
- Wortübersetzungsoptionen
- Anwendungsbeispiele (mehrere Phrasen mit Übersetzung)
- Etymologie
Was (wer) ist R v Hughes (Canada) - definition
R v Hughes (Canada)
R v Hughes (also known as the Canadian Right to Food Trial) is an ongoing court trial on the right to food in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Carter v Canada (AG)
DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
Carter v. Canada; Carter v. Canada (AG); Carter v Canada (Attorney General); Carter v Canada
Carter v Canada (AG), 2015 SCC 5 is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision where the prohibition of assisted suicide was challenged as contrary to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter") by several parties, including the family of Kay Carter, a woman suffering from degenerative spinal stenosis, and Gloria Taylor, a woman suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis ("ALS").Carter v.
R v Hughes
.svg?width=200)
R v Hughes is a 2002 Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) case in which it was held that it was unconstitutional in Saint Lucia for capital punishment to be the mandatory sentence for murder. The JCPC held that because the Constitution of Saint Lucia prohibits "inhuman or degrading punishment", following a murder conviction, a trial judge must have discretion to impose a lesser penalty than death by hanging; capital punishment may be applied only in those cases that contain aggravating factors as compared to other murder cases.
Wikipedia
R v Hughes (Canada)
R v Hughes (also known as the Canadian Right to Food Trial) is an ongoing court trial on the right to food in Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
