AFFIRMATIVES - Übersetzung nach arabisch
DICLIB.COM
KI-basierte Sprachtools
Geben Sie ein Wort oder eine Phrase in einer beliebigen Sprache ein 👆
Sprache:     

Übersetzung und Analyse von Wörtern durch künstliche Intelligenz

Auf dieser Seite erhalten Sie eine detaillierte Analyse eines Wortes oder einer Phrase mithilfe der besten heute verfügbaren Technologie der künstlichen Intelligenz:

  • wie das Wort verwendet wird
  • Häufigkeit der Nutzung
  • es wird häufiger in mündlicher oder schriftlicher Rede verwendet
  • Wortübersetzungsoptionen
  • Anwendungsbeispiele (mehrere Phrasen mit Übersetzung)
  • Etymologie

AFFIRMATIVES - Übersetzung nach arabisch

STYLE OF SPEECH COMPETITION RELATING TO GOVERNMENT POLICY
Cross-examination debate; Policy Debate; Affirmative (policy debate); Negative (policy debate); Judge (policy debate); MPJ; Mutual preference judging; CX debate; Dabait; Db8; CX Debate; Policy debater; Forensic debate; Affirmatives; Cx debate

AFFIRMATIVES         

ألاسم

أَجَابَ بِالإِيجاب ; إيجاب

الصفة

إِثْباتِيّ ; أَكِيد ; تَأكِيديّ ; تَثْبِيتَة ; تَقْرِيرِيّ ; تَوْكِيدِيّ ; ثَابِت ; ثُبُوتِي ; دَلِيلِيّ ; مُثَبِّت ; مُثْبَت ; مَثْبُوت ; مُدَلَّلٌ عَلَيْه ; مُرَسِّخ ; مُوَكَّد ; مُوَكِّد

Wikipedia

Policy debate

Policy debate is an American form of debate competition in which teams of two usually advocate for and against a resolution that typically calls for policy change by the United States federal government. It is also referred to as cross-examination debate (sometimes shortened to Cross-X or CX) because of the 3-minute questioning period following each constructive speech. Evidence presentation is a crucial part of Policy Debate. The main argument being debated during a round is to change or not change the status quo. When a team explains why their solvency is greater than the opposition's, they compare advantages. One team’s job is to argue that the resolution— the statement that we should make some specific change to a national or international problem —is a good idea. Affirmative teams generally present a plan as a proposal for implementation of the resolution. On the other hand, the Negative teams present arguments against the implementation of the resolution. In a single round of debate competition, each person gives two speeches. The first speech each person gives is called a “constructive” speech, because it is the speech when the first speaker positively, without rebuttal that has not occurred, presents the basic arguments they will make throughout the debate. The second speech is called a “rebuttal”, because this is the speech were each person tries to rebut (or refute) the arguments made by the other team, while using their own arguments to try to convince the judge to vote for their team. The Affirmative has to convince the judge to vote for the resolution, while the Negative has to convince the judge the Negative's position is a better idea.

High school policy debate is sponsored by various organizations including the National Speech and Debate Association, National Association of Urban Debate Leagues, Catholic Forensic League, Stoa USA, and the National Christian Forensics and Communications Association, as well as many other regional speech organizations. Collegiate policy debates are generally governed by the guidelines of National Debate Tournament (NDT) and the Cross Examination Debate Association (CEDA), which have been joined at the collegiate level. A one-person policy format is sanctioned by the National Forensic Association (NFA)) on the collegiate level as well.