Auf dieser Seite erhalten Sie eine detaillierte Analyse eines Wortes oder einer Phrase mithilfe der besten heute verfügbaren Technologie der künstlichen Intelligenz:
ألاسم
صُفَار ; صُفَارُ البَيْض ; صَفْراء ; مُحّ ; مُصْفَرّ
الفعل
اِصْفَرَّ
الصفة
مَثَار ; مُثِير ; مُثِيرٌ لِلشَّهْوَةِ الجِنْسِيَّة ; مُثِيرٌ لِلْعاطِفَة ; مَجْلَبَة ; مُحَرِّض ; مُحَرِّك ; مُسْتَثِير
Identifying human races in terms of skin color, at least as one among several physiological characteristics, has been common since antiquity. Such divisions appeared in rabbinical literature and in early modern scholarship, usually dividing humankind into four or five categories, with color-based labels: red, yellow, black, white, and sometimes brown. It was long recognized that the number of categories is arbitrary and subjective, and different ethnic groups were placed in different categories at different points in time. François Bernier (1684) doubted the validity of using skin color as a racial characteristic, and Charles Darwin (1871) emphasized the gradual differences between categories. Today there is broad agreement among scientists that typological conceptions of race have no scientific basis.