Μετάφραση και ανάλυση λέξεων από την τεχνητή νοημοσύνη ChatGPT
Σε αυτήν τη σελίδα μπορείτε να λάβετε μια λεπτομερή ανάλυση μιας λέξης ή μιας φράσης, η οποία δημιουργήθηκε χρησιμοποιώντας το ChatGPT, την καλύτερη τεχνολογία τεχνητής νοημοσύνης μέχρι σήμερα:
- πώς χρησιμοποιείται η λέξη
- συχνότητα χρήσης
- χρησιμοποιείται πιο συχνά στον προφορικό ή γραπτό λόγο
- επιλογές μετάφρασης λέξεων
- παραδείγματα χρήσης (πολλές φράσεις με μετάφραση)
- ετυμολογία
Τι (ποιος) είναι Hamitic$505540$ - ορισμός
' (11204692506).jpg?width=200 "1889 ethnographic map of Africa, with \"Hamites\" shown in white.")
![Beja]] were the model for the conflation of ethnic and linguistic evidence in the construction of Hamitic identity.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Bedscha.jpg?width=200 "Beja]] were the model for the conflation of ethnic and linguistic evidence in the construction of Hamitic identity.")
![Ham]]'s sons in blue, [[Shem]]'s sons in green.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Josephustable 3.svg?width=200 "Ham]]'s sons in blue, [[Shem]]'s sons in green.")
![Egyptian]] woman with ovoid facial profile, from [[Giuseppe Sergi]]'s ''The Mediterranean Race'' (1901).](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/TMR-Hm1.png?width=200 "Egyptian]] woman with ovoid facial profile, from [[Giuseppe Sergi]]'s ''The Mediterranean Race'' (1901).")
![Ham]]).](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/T and O map Guntherus Ziner 1472.jpg?width=200 "Ham]]).")
Βικιπαίδεια
Paranilotic is a group of languages proposed by Carl Meinhof. Karl Lepsius had established the Nilotic languages as a family, with Western, Eastern, and Southern branches. Meinhof proposed that only Western were truly Nilotic, and that Eastern and Southern, which he called Nilo-Hamitic, were a mixture of (Western) Nilotic and Hamitic languages (in particular, modern Cushitic), based on racial and other non-linguistic considerations. Joseph Greenberg reverted to Lepsius's classification, as part of an attempt to remove racial classifications from African linguistics. However, Tucker and Bryan's (1956, 1966) influential surveys resurrected Meinhof's proposal under the name Paranilotic, and that name is still sometimes found, especially in non-linguistic works. Modern linguistics has discarded the concept of Paranilotic, seeing Nilotic more or less as Lepsius had, with three distinct branches.
