Diclib.com
Λεξικό ChatGPT

Αναζήτηση λεξικού Προσαρμοσμένες λύσεις

Εισάγετε μια λέξη ή φράση σε οποιαδήποτε γλώσσα 👆

Γλώσσα:

Μετάφραση και ανάλυση λέξεων από την τεχνητή νοημοσύνη ChatGPT

Σε αυτήν τη σελίδα μπορείτε να λάβετε μια λεπτομερή ανάλυση μιας λέξης ή μιας φράσης, η οποία δημιουργήθηκε χρησιμοποιώντας το ChatGPT, την καλύτερη τεχνολογία τεχνητής νοημοσύνης μέχρι σήμερα:

πώς χρησιμοποιείται η λέξη
συχνότητα χρήσης
χρησιμοποιείται πιο συχνά στον προφορικό ή γραπτό λόγο
επιλογές μετάφρασης λέξεων
παραδείγματα χρήσης (πολλές φράσεις με μετάφραση)
ετυμολογία

primary document - translation to ρωσικά

ARTIFACT, DOCUMENT, DIARY, MANUSCRIPT, AUTOBIOGRAPHY, A RECORDING, OR OTHER SOURCE OF INFORMATION THAT WAS CREATED AT THE TIME UNDER STUDY

Primary sources; Primary documents; Primary Sources; Primary Source; Primary document; Primary source documents; Primary source document; Primary literature; Primary scientific literature; Primary text; Primary reference; The Primary Source

primary document

первичный документ

primary source

первичный источник; первоначальный источник информации (дневник, сообщение).

primary source

первоисточник

Ορισμός

Direct primary

·add. ·- A primary by which direct nominations of candidates for office are made.

Εμφάνιση περισσότερων ορισμών

Βικιπαίδεια

Primary source

In the study of history as an academic discipline, a primary source (also called an original source) is an artifact, document, diary, manuscript, autobiography, recording, or any other source of information that was created at the time under study. It serves as an original source of information about the topic. Similar definitions can be used in library science and other areas of scholarship, although different fields have somewhat different definitions.

In journalism, a primary source can be a person with direct knowledge of a situation, or a document written by such a person.

Primary sources are distinguished from secondary sources, which cite, comment on, or build upon primary sources. Generally, accounts written after the fact with the benefit of hindsight are secondary. A secondary source may also be a primary source depending on how it is used. For example, a memoir would be considered a primary source in research concerning its author or about their friends characterized within it, but the same memoir would be a secondary source if it were used to examine the culture in which its author lived. "Primary" and "secondary" should be understood as relative terms, with sources categorized according to specific historical contexts and what is being studied.^{: 118–246}

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary source

Παραδείγματα από το σώμα κειμένου για primary document

1. For instance, one article in the Augsburg Confession (the primary document of Lutheran Protestantism) reads: "It is also taught among us that saints should be kept in remembrance so that our faith may be strengthened when we see what grace they received and how they were sustained by faith.

2. McClellan granted his first cable news interview last week to Bush–bashing MSNBC host Keith Olbermann, while Bill O‘Reilly accused the ex–spokesman of initially blowing off his Fox program in favor of "far–left venues." Olbermann hailed the book, "What Happened," as "a primary document of American history" that contained "poetry." Talk about role reversal: It was Olbermann who said in 2005 that "whenever I hear Scott McClellan talking about ‘media credibility,‘ I strain to remember who it was who admitted Jeff Gannon to the White House press room and called on him all those times." (Gannon, a conservative blogger with an X–rated past, now says, "Scott McClellan‘s credibility is zero.") McClellan wrote the book, says historian Michael Beschloss, knowing that "the president‘s opponents will pick it up and use it very zealously." And that is a tradition as old as the republic.

3. McClellan granted his first cable news interview last week to Bush–bashing MSNBC host Keith Olbermann, while Bill O‘Reilly accused the ex–spokesman of initially blowing off his Fox program in favor of "far–left venues." Olbermann hailed the book, "What Happened," as "a primary document of American history" that contained "poetry." Talk about role reversal: It was Olbermann who said in 2005 that "whenever I hear Scott McClellan talking about ‘media credibility,‘ I strain to remember who it was who admitted Jeff Gannon to the White House press room and called on him all those times." (Gannon, a conservative blogger with an X–rated past, now says "Scott McClellan‘s credibility is zero.") McClellan wrote the book, says historian Michael Beschloss, knowing that "the president‘s opponents will pick it up and use it very zealously." And that is a tradition as old as the republic.

Μετάφραση του &#39primary document&#39 σε Ρωσικά