et al - meaning and definition. What is et al
DICLIB.COM
AI-based language tools
All tools Subscription Contact Us
Get Unlimited AI
Enter a word or phrase in any language 👆
Language:     

Translation and analysis of words by artificial intelligence

On this page you can get a detailed analysis of a word or phrase, produced by the best artificial intelligence technology to date:

  • how the word is used
  • frequency of use
  • it is used more often in oral or written speech
  • word translation options
  • usage examples (several phrases with translation)
  • etymology
  1. Traditional dictionaries
  2. English dictionary
  3. et al

What (who) is et al - definition

RELIGIOUS FREEDOM CASE HEARD BEFORE THE US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
C.H. v. Oliva et al.; C H v. Oliva et al.; CH v. Oliva et al.; C. H. v. Oliva et al.

Rind et al. controversy         
SCIENTIFIC CONTROVERSY
A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples; Rind et al.; Rind, et al.; Rind et al; Rind et.al; Rind et al. 1998; The Rind report; The Rind Report; Rind report; Rind Report; Rind et al. (1998); Rind et al controversy; Rind controversy; Bruce Rind
The Rind et al. controversy was a debate in the scientific literature, public media, and government legislatures in the United States regarding a 1998 peer reviewed meta-analysis of the self-reported harm caused by child sexual abuse (CSA).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rind_et_al._controversy
Crick, Brenner et al. experiment         
The Crick, Brenner et al. experiment
The Crick, Brenner et al. experiment (1961) was a scientific experiment performed by Francis Crick, Sydney Brenner, Leslie Barnett and R.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crick,_Brenner_et_al._experiment
Allison v. ExxonMobil Corp.         
Jacksonville, MD ExxonMobil Gas Leak Case; Allison, Et Al v. ExxonMobil Corp, Et Al; Allison, et al. v. ExxonMobil Corp, et al.
The Jacksonville, Maryland, ExxonMobil gas leak case is a series of lawsuits against ExxonMobil as a result of a February 2006 underground gasoline leak from an ExxonMobil service station in Jacksonville, Maryland.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allison_v._ExxonMobil_Corp.

Wikipedia

C. H. v. Oliva

C. H. v. Oliva, 226 F.3d 198 (3d Cir. 2000), was a religious freedom case in which mother Carol Hood sued Grace Oliva, her son Zachary's first grade teacher, and related administrators in the Medford Township Public Schools for not allowing the child to read a section of the Bible in class. His kindergarten class had made Thanksgiving paintings the year prior, and his was taken down and subsequently reposted in a less noticeable place for its religious content. The poster was called "I'm Thankful for Jesus." Carol Hood met with Principal Gail Pratt, who defended the school's decisions. She said that reading the story "was the equivalent of 'praying'." Noting that she had received complaints in the past, Ms. Pratt stated that the story "might upset Muslim, Hindu or Jewish students." She added that there was "no place in the public school for the reading of the Bible" and advised: " '[M]aybe you should consider taking your child out of public school, since you don't appear to be public school material.' " Ms. Pratt noted that "her position was fully supported by various legal authorities."

The district court judge ruled that the teacher had exercised reasonable judgment in refusing to allow the book to be read in class. He agreed with the lower court that a first grader would not be able to distinguish between a student reading the Bible as constitutionally-protected free expression, and the teacher endorsing a religion by interrupting class to allow him to read it. Under the establishment clause, other students have a right to be free from religious endorsement by the government.

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, at the time an appeals court judge, agreed with the district court judge on the matter of the book. However, he dissented that the replacement of the poster inhibited Zachary's right to free expression.

The appeals court, sitting en banc, split 6-6. The ruling defaulted to the district court, which had held against the Hoods.

In June 2001, the Supreme Court of the United States declined to hear the case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C. H. v. Oliva
Examples of use of et al
1. Kaminsky et al wanted to sell an apartment, Gershonovitz et al showed an interest in buying it and even visited it a few times.
2. VILLAGE OF HOFFMAN ESTATES, Illinois, et al., Appellants, v.
3. In some ways, Atropos et al have been made redundant.
4. TROST VILLAGE OF HOFFMAN ESTATES, Illinois, et al., Appellants, v.
5. After the court ruling, in Massachusetts et al. v.