Meaning: "Systematic failures" refer to consistent and recurring failures that are part of a system, often due to flaws in the system's design or functioning. These failures are not random; rather, they are predictable outcomes based on how the system operates. It can apply to various contexts, including engineering, organizational structures, processes, and even human behavior.
Frequency of Use: The phrase "systematic failures" is used fairly often in both written and oral contexts. It is more common in formal writing, such as reports, academic papers, and articles dealing with analysis of systems, but can also appear in conversations about organizational issues and project management.
"L'enquête a révélé de nombreuses défaillances systématiques dans le processus de gestion de l'entreprise."
"To prevent future systematic failures, we need to redesign the operational framework."
"Pour prévenir de futures défaillances systématiques, nous devons repenser le cadre opérationnel."
"The systematic failures in public health policy led to the spread of misinformation."
While "systematic failures" itself might not be used in many idiomatic expressions, the concept of systematic issues can be reflected in various idioms related to failure and systemic problems. Here are some examples:
Meaning: It suggests that unknown future possibilities (or failures) can be strategically significant and should be interpreted cautiously.
"The straw that broke the camel's back."
Meaning: A small action leading to a significant failure or breakdown within a system.
"Can't make an omelet without breaking eggs."
Meaning: Systematic failures are sometimes a necessary part of progress and innovation.
"Throwing good money after bad."
Systemic issues
Antonyms:
This structured information provides a comprehensive overview of the phrase "systematic failures," including its meaning, usage, and related expressions.