Traducción y análisis de palabras por inteligencia artificial ChatGPT
En esta página puede obtener un análisis detallado de una palabra o frase, producido utilizando la mejor tecnología de inteligencia artificial hasta la fecha:
- cómo se usa la palabra
- frecuencia de uso
- se utiliza con más frecuencia en el habla oral o escrita
- opciones de traducción
- ejemplos de uso (varias frases con traducción)
- etimología
just war - traducción al ruso
 - The Four Doctors of the Western Church, Saint Augustine of Hippo (354–430).jpg?width=200)
![Just (black) major and parallel minor triad, compared to its equal temperament (gray) approximations, within the [[chromatic circle]]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/12-tet scale compared to just in the chromatic circle.svg?width=200 "Just (black) major and parallel minor triad, compared to its equal temperament (gray) approximations, within the [[chromatic circle]]")
![b}} tuned 9:5 above C.[[File:Harmonic seventh chord just on C.mid]]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Harmonic seventh chord just on C.png?width=200 "b}} tuned 9:5 above C.[[File:Harmonic seventh chord just on C.mid]]")
![jstor=833435}}</ref> using Johnston notation[[File:Notation of partials 1-19 for 1-1.mid]]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Notation of partials 1-19 for 1-1.png?width=200 "jstor=833435}}</ref> using Johnston notation[[File:Notation of partials 1-19 for 1-1.mid]]")
![Primary triads in C[[File:Primary triads in C just.mid]]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Primary triads in C.png?width=200 "Primary triads in C[[File:Primary triads in C just.mid]]")
Definición
Wikipedia
 - The Four Doctors of the Western Church, Saint Augustine of Hippo (354–430).jpg?width=120)
The just war theory (Latin: bellum iustum) is a doctrine, also referred to as a tradition, of military ethics which is studied by military leaders, theologians, ethicists and policy makers. The purpose of the doctrine is to ensure that a war is morally justifiable through a series of criteria, all of which must be met for a war to be considered just. The criteria are split into two groups: jus ad bellum ("right to go to war") and jus in bello ("right conduct in war"). The first group of criteria concerns the morality of going to war, and the second group of criteria concerns the moral conduct within war. There have been calls for the inclusion of a third category of just war theory (jus post bellum) dealing with the morality of post-war settlement and reconstruction. The just war theory postulates the belief that war, while it is terrible but less so with the right conduct, is not always the worst option. Important responsibilities, undesirable outcomes, or preventable atrocities may justify war.
Opponents of the just war theory may either be inclined to a stricter pacifist standard (proposing that there has never been nor can there ever be a justifiable basis for war) or they may be inclined toward a more permissive nationalist standard (proposing that a war need only to serve a nation's interests to be justifiable). In many cases, philosophers state that individuals do not need to be plagued by a guilty conscience if they are required to fight. A few philosophers ennoble the virtues of the soldier while they also declare their apprehensions for war itself. A few, such as Rousseau, argue for insurrection against oppressive rule.
The historical aspect, or the "just war tradition", deals with the historical body of rules or agreements that have applied in various wars across the ages. The just war tradition also considers the writings of various philosophers and lawyers through history, and examines both their philosophical visions of war's ethical limits and whether their thoughts have contributed to the body of conventions that have evolved to guide war and warfare.
