actor language - significado y definición. Qué es actor language
Diclib.com
Diccionario ChatGPT
Ingrese una palabra o frase en cualquier idioma 👆
Idioma:

Traducción y análisis de palabras por inteligencia artificial ChatGPT

En esta página puede obtener un análisis detallado de una palabra o frase, producido utilizando la mejor tecnología de inteligencia artificial hasta la fecha:

  • cómo se usa la palabra
  • frecuencia de uso
  • se utiliza con más frecuencia en el habla oral o escrita
  • opciones de traducción
  • ejemplos de uso (varias frases con traducción)
  • etimología

Qué (quién) es actor language - definición

COGNITIVE BIAS
Actor-observer; Actor observer; Actor observer bias; Actor-observer effect; Actor-observer bias; Actor-observer asymmetry; Actor–observer bias

Crisis actor         
INDIVIDUAL WHO PORTRAYS A DISASTER VICTIM
Crisis actors; Crisis actor (conspiracy theory); Actor-patient; Actor victim; Crisis Actors
A crisis actor (aka actor-patient or actor victim) is a trained actor, role player, volunteer, or other person engaged to portray a disaster victim during emergency drills to train first responders such as police, firefighters or EMS personnel. Crisis actors are used to create high-fidelity simulations of disasters in order to allow first responders to practice their skills and help emergency services organizations to prepare and train in realistic scenarios as part of full-scale disaster exercises.
Actor-Based Concurrent Language         
FAMILY OF PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES
ABCL/1; Object-Based Concurrent Language; ABCL/c+; ABCL/c; ABCL/R; ABCL/R2; ABCL/1 programming language; ABCL/1 (programming language); ABCL/c plus programming language; ABCL/c plus (programming language); ABCL/R programming language; ABCL/R (programming language); ABCL/R2 programming language; ABCL/R2 (programming language); ABCL/c plus
Actor-Based Concurrent Language (ABCL) is a family of programming languages, developed in Japan in the 1980s and 1990s.
Actor–network theory         
THEORY WITHIN SOCIAL SCIENCE
Actor network theory; Actor-Network Theory; Actor-network; Actor-network theory; Criticism of actor–network theory; Criticism of actor-network theory
Actor–network theory (ANT) is a theoretical and methodological approach to social theory where everything in the social and natural worlds exists in constantly shifting networks of relationships. It posits that nothing exists outside those relationships.

Wikipedia

Actor–observer asymmetry

Actor–observer asymmetry (also actor–observer bias) is a bias one makes when forming attributions about the behavior of others or themselves depending on whether they are an actor or an observer in a situation. When people judge their own behavior, they are more likely to attribute their actions to the particular situation than to their personality. However, when an observer is explaining the behavior of another person, they are more likely to attribute this behavior to the actors' personality rather than to situational factors.

Sometimes the actor-observer asymmetry is defined as the fundamental attribution error, which is when people tend to focus on the internal, personal characteristic or disposition as the cause of behavior rather than the external factors or situational influences.

This term falls under attribution theory. The specific hypothesis of an actor-observer asymmetry in attribution was originally proposed by Edward Jones and Richard Nisbett, where they said that "actors tend to attribute the causes of their behavior to stimuli inherent in the situation, while observers tend to attribute behavior to stable dispositions of the actor". Supported by initial evidence, the hypothesis was long held as firmly established. However, a meta-analysis of all the published tests of the hypothesis between 1971 and 2004 found that there was no actor-observer asymmetry of the sort that had been previously proposed. Malle interpreted this result not so much as proof that actors and observers explained behavior exactly the same way but as evidence that the original hypothesis was fundamentally flawed in the way it framed people's explanations of behavior as attributions to either stable dispositions or to the situation.

Considerations of actor-observer differences can be found in other disciplines as well, such as philosophy (e.g. privileged access, incorrigibility), management studies, artificial intelligence, semiotics, anthropology, and political science.