Entrez un mot ou une phrase dans n'importe quelle langue 👆
Langue:
Traduction et analyse de mots par intelligence artificielle ChatGPT
Sur cette page, vous pouvez obtenir une analyse détaillée d'un mot ou d'une phrase, réalisée à l'aide de la meilleure technologie d'intelligence artificielle à ce jour:
- comment le mot est utilisé
- fréquence d'utilisation
- il est utilisé plus souvent dans le discours oral ou écrit
- options de traduction de mots
- exemples d'utilisation (plusieurs phrases avec traduction)
- étymologie
Qu'est-ce (qui) est DHN Food Distributors Ltd v Tower Hamlets LBC - définition
DHN Food Distributors Ltd v Tower Hamlets LBC
DHN Food Distributors Ltd v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [1976] 1 WLR 852 is a UK company law case where, on the basis that a company should be compensated for loss of its business under a compulsory acquisition order, a group was recognised as a single economic entity. It stands as a liberal example of when UK courts may lift the veil of incorporation of a company.
Mayor of Tower Hamlets
.jpg?width=200)
DIRECTLY ELECTED MAYOR OF TOWER HAMLETS LONDON BOROUGH COUNCIL
Executive Mayor of Tower Hamlets; Elected mayor of Tower Hamlets; Directly elected Mayor of Tower Hamlets; Tower Hamlets mayoral election, 2010; Directly elected mayor of Tower Hamlets; Directly elected mayor of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets; 2010 Tower Hamlets mayoral election; 2014 Tower Hamlets mayoral election; 2018 Tower Hamlets mayoral election; Directly-elected mayor of Tower Hamlets
The mayor of Tower Hamlets is the directly elected mayor of Tower Hamlets London Borough Council in east London, England. The first election for this position occurred on 21 October 2010, taking on the executive function of the borough council.
Wiluszynski v London Borough of Tower Hamlets
UK LEGAL CASE
Wilusynski v London Borough of Tower Hamlets; Wiluszynski v Tower Hamlets LBC
Wiluszynski v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [1989] ICR 439 is a UK labour law case concerning the contract of employment. It held that if an employment was only partly performed due to a strike, this could be construed as not completing an entire obligation, so that even if an employer has received much more value, they need to pay nothing.
