provisional remedy - définition. Qu'est-ce que provisional remedy
Diclib.com
Dictionnaire ChatGPT
Entrez un mot ou une phrase dans n'importe quelle langue 👆
Langue:

Traduction et analyse de mots par intelligence artificielle ChatGPT

Sur cette page, vous pouvez obtenir une analyse détaillée d'un mot ou d'une phrase, réalisée à l'aide de la meilleure technologie d'intelligence artificielle à ce jour:

  • comment le mot est utilisé
  • fréquence d'utilisation
  • il est utilisé plus souvent dans le discours oral ou écrit
  • options de traduction de mots
  • exemples d'utilisation (plusieurs phrases avec traduction)
  • étymologie

Qu'est-ce (qui) est provisional remedy - définition

Provisional damages

provisional remedy         
n. a generic term for any temporary order of a court to protect a party from irreparable damage while a lawsuit or petition is pending. See also: temporary injunction
Provisional remedy         
The purpose of a provisional remedy is the preservation of the status quo until final disposition of a matter can occur.
Provisional stamp         
  • 1899 Cuban provisional stamp printed in the town of Puerto Príncipe. Note that ''cents'' is misspelled ''eents''
  • Provisional stamp issued in St. Louis, 1845
STAMPS ISSUED UNTIL PERMANENT SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE
Provisional Stamp
Linn's World Stamp AlmanacDonna O'Keefe Houseman, editor; Linn's World Stamp Almanac, Millennium (6th) Edition. defines a provisional stamp as "a postage stamp issued for temporary use to meet postal demands until new or regular stocks of stamps can be obtained.

Wikipédia

Provisional remedy

The purpose of a provisional remedy is the preservation of the status quo until final disposition of a matter can occur.

Under United States law, FRCP 64 provides with several types of seizure (e.g. garnishment, replevin, attachment) that a Federal Court may use pursuant to state law. FRCP 65 concerns Temporary Restraining Order (may be made ex parte) and preliminary injunction (requires some hearing).

In order to establish the constitutionality of a provisional remedy, two cases must be distinguished. The 3-part test established in Matthews determines whether a prejudgment remedy meets the constitutional requirements when Government seeks deprivation on its own initiative. The court must take into consideration the private interest of the party against whom the remedy is sought, the risk of erroneous deprivation as well as the probable value, if any, of addition or substitute safeguards and, the moving party's interest.

The 3-part test established in Connecticut v. Doehr determines whether a prejudgment remedy meets the constitutional requirements when Government action is applied to a suit between private parties. The due process analysis involves the same requirements as set forth in Matthews.

The court must also take into account whether there are exigent circumstances, a bond requirement, a judicial assessment, a detailed statement of factual basis, and a prompt post-seizure hearing.