Traduzione e analisi delle parole tramite l'intelligenza artificiale ChatGPT
In questa pagina puoi ottenere un'analisi dettagliata di una parola o frase, prodotta utilizzando la migliore tecnologia di intelligenza artificiale fino ad oggi:
- come viene usata la parola
- frequenza di utilizzo
- è usato più spesso nel discorso orale o scritto
- opzioni di traduzione delle parole
- esempi di utilizzo (varie frasi con traduzione)
- etimologia
Cosa (chi) è teapot$81895$ - definizione
![Martin Newell]] modelled, displayed at the [[Computer History Museum]] in [[Mountain View, California]] (1990–present)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Original Utah Teapot.jpg?width=200 "Martin Newell]] modelled, displayed at the [[Computer History Museum]] in [[Mountain View, California]] (1990–present)")
!["The Six Platonic Solids", an image that humorously adds the Utah teapot to the five standard [[Platonic solid]]s](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/The Six Platonic Solids.png?width=200 "\"The Six Platonic Solids\", an image that humorously adds the Utah teapot to the five standard [[Platonic solid]]s")
![[[Environment mapping]] on the teapot](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Environment mapping.png?width=200 "[[Environment mapping]] on the teapot")
![[[Albert B. Fall]] was the first U.S. cabinet official sentenced to prison.](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Albert B. Fall with map background.jpg?width=200 "[[Albert B. Fall]] was the first U.S. cabinet official sentenced to prison.")
Wikipedia
Russell's teapot is an analogy, formulated by the philosopher Bertrand Russell (1872–1970), to illustrate that the philosophic burden of proof lies upon a person making empirically unfalsifiable claims, rather than shifting the burden of disproof to others.
Russell specifically applied his analogy in the context of religion. He wrote that if he were to assert, without offering proof, that a teapot, too small to be seen by telescopes, orbits the Sun somewhere in space between the Earth and Mars, he could not expect anyone to believe him solely because his assertion could not be proven wrong.
The analogy has been criticised by philosophers Brian Garvey, Peter van Inwagen and Alvin Plantinga as to its validity regarding religion. Russell's teapot has given rise to similar analogies as well as been used in parodies of religion.
