éclos$1$ - vertaling naar
Diclib.com
Woordenboek ChatGPT
Voer een woord of zin in in een taal naar keuze 👆
Taal:

Vertaling en analyse van woorden door kunstmatige intelligentie ChatGPT

Op deze pagina kunt u een gedetailleerde analyse krijgen van een woord of zin, geproduceerd met behulp van de beste kunstmatige intelligentietechnologie tot nu toe:

  • hoe het woord wordt gebruikt
  • gebruiksfrequentie
  • het wordt vaker gebruikt in mondelinge of schriftelijke toespraken
  • opties voor woordvertaling
  • Gebruiksvoorbeelden (meerdere zinnen met vertaling)
  • etymologie

éclos$1$ - vertaling naar

DIVERGENT SERIES
1+1+1+···; 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + · · ·; 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + · · ·; 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + …; 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ...; Zeta(0)
  • alt=A graph showing a line that dips just below the ''y''-axis

éclos      
n. bloom

Definitie

one
the upper limit of intoxication or exhaustion
after the second pint of gin, i was hard one-ing

Wikipedia

1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯

In mathematics, 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯, also written n = 1 n 0 {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }n^{0}} , n = 1 1 n {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }1^{n}} , or simply n = 1 1 {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }1} , is a divergent series, meaning that its sequence of partial sums does not converge to a limit in the real numbers. The sequence 1n can be thought of as a geometric series with the common ratio 1. Unlike other geometric series with rational ratio (except −1), it converges in neither the real numbers nor in the p-adic numbers for some p. In the context of the extended real number line

n = 1 1 = + , {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }1=+\infty \,,}

since its sequence of partial sums increases monotonically without bound.

Where the sum of n0 occurs in physical applications, it may sometimes be interpreted by zeta function regularization, as the value at s = 0 of the Riemann zeta function:

ζ ( s ) = n = 1 1 n s = 1 1 2 1 s n = 1 ( 1 ) n + 1 n s . {\displaystyle \zeta (s)=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{n^{s}}}={\frac {1}{1-2^{1-s}}}\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {(-1)^{n+1}}{n^{s}}}\,.}

The two formulas given above are not valid at zero however, but the analytic continuation is.

ζ ( s ) = 2 s π s 1   sin ( π s 2 )   Γ ( 1 s )   ζ ( 1 s ) , {\displaystyle \zeta (s)=2^{s}\pi ^{s-1}\ \sin \left({\frac {\pi s}{2}}\right)\ \Gamma (1-s)\ \zeta (1-s)\!,}

Using this one gets (given that Γ(1) = 1),

ζ ( 0 ) = 1 π lim s 0   sin ( π s 2 )   ζ ( 1 s ) = 1 π lim s 0   ( π s 2 π 3 s 3 48 + . . . )   ( 1 s + . . . ) = 1 2 {\displaystyle \zeta (0)={\frac {1}{\pi }}\lim _{s\rightarrow 0}\ \sin \left({\frac {\pi s}{2}}\right)\ \zeta (1-s)={\frac {1}{\pi }}\lim _{s\rightarrow 0}\ \left({\frac {\pi s}{2}}-{\frac {\pi ^{3}s^{3}}{48}}+...\right)\ \left(-{\frac {1}{s}}+...\right)=-{\frac {1}{2}}}

where the power series expansion for ζ(s) about s = 1 follows because ζ(s) has a simple pole of residue one there. In this sense 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯ = ζ(0) = −1/2.

Emilio Elizalde presents a comment from others about the series:

In a short period of less than a year, two distinguished physicists, A. Slavnov and F. Yndurain, gave seminars in Barcelona, about different subjects. It was remarkable that, in both presentations, at some point the speaker addressed the audience with these words: 'As everybody knows, 1 + 1 + 1 + ⋯ = −1/2.' Implying maybe: If you do not know this, it is no use to continue listening.