sat in judgement - vertaling naar Engels
Diclib.com
Woordenboek ChatGPT
Voer een woord of zin in in een taal naar keuze 👆
Taal:

Vertaling en analyse van woorden door kunstmatige intelligentie ChatGPT

Op deze pagina kunt u een gedetailleerde analyse krijgen van een woord of zin, geproduceerd met behulp van de beste kunstmatige intelligentietechnologie tot nu toe:

  • hoe het woord wordt gebruikt
  • gebruiksfrequentie
  • het wordt vaker gebruikt in mondelinge of schriftelijke toespraken
  • opties voor woordvertaling
  • Gebruiksvoorbeelden (meerdere zinnen met vertaling)
  • etymologie

sat in judgement - vertaling naar Engels

1984 BOOK BY FEDERAL JUDGE HERBERT JAY STERN
Judgement in Berlin

sat in judgement      
sedette in giudizio
Scholastic Aptitude Test         
  • 2003 SAT scores by race and ethnicity
  • center
  • center
  • Logo as of 2013
  • Old SAT logo
  • An example of an SAT "grid-in" math question and the correctly gridded answer
  • center
  • SAT mathematics questions can be answered intuitively or algorithmically.
  • center
  • A U.S. Navy sailor taking the SAT aboard the U.S.S ''Kitty Hawk'' in 2004
  • center
STANDARDIZED COLLEGE ADMISSION TEST IN THE UNITED STATES
Scholastic Achievment Test; Scholastic Achievement Test; SAT I: Reasoning Test; SAT college entrance test; Scholastic Assessment Test; SAT Vocabulary; S.A.T.; SAT I; SAT scores; Perfect 4800; Scholastic Aptitude Test; SAT Essay; Sat essay prompts; SAT Essay Topics; S.A.T; SAT math; SAT's; SAT Writing; SAT Writing Section; S.A.T.s; SAT Prompts; SAT Essay Prompts; SAT test; SAT (examination); Standardized Aptitude Test; Scholastic aptitude test; SAT tests; Writing SAT; SAT-I; SAT Reasoning Test; SAT (test); Biases in the Current SAT; SAT training; SAT prep; SAT score; SAT Test; Sat test; EBRW; Evidence-based Reading and Writing; SAT-M; SAT test prep
Esame per l"idoneità scolastica
crack of doom         
  • The Last Judgment mosaic (14th-century), south facade of Saint Vitus Cathedral, Prague, Czech Republic
  • website=lib.ugent.be}}</ref>
  • 0884022358}}. pp. 229–231.</ref>
  • The Grave]]"
  • upright=1.5
  • ''The Last Judgment'', 17th-century [[icon]] from Lipie. Historic Museum in [[Sanok]], [[Poland]].
  • ''The Last Judgment'', mural from [[Voroneț Monastery]], [[Romania]]
RELIGIOUS TERM
Crack of doom; Day of judgment; Judgment Day; Last judgment; Judgement day; Judgment day; Last judgement; Day of Judgement; The Last Judgement; The Last Judgment; Last Trump of Doom; Signs of the Judgement Day; Day of Judgment; Final judgement; Last Judgement; Judgment, Last; Day of judgement; Final Judgment; Judgement Day; Last Day; Final judgment; Crack of Doom; Final Judgement; Judgment date; Great White Throne; Great White Throne Judgment; Last Judgment, The; The Day of Judgement; Day Of Judgment; Universal Judgment; 2012 Judgement Day; The Day of Judgment; Day of Judgment in Islam; Day of Judgement in Islam; Judgment-day; 2 Corinthians 5:10; Judgment Day in Islam; Judgment-day in Islam; Final judgment in Islam; Day of judgment in Islam; Signs of the Day of Judgment
il giorno del giudizio

Definitie

SAT
also sat
The SAT is an examination which is often taken by students who wish to enter a college or university. SAT is an abbreviation for 'Scholastic Aptitude Test'. (AM)
N-PROPER

Wikipedia

Judgment in Berlin

Judgment in Berlin is a 1984 book by federal judge Herbert Jay Stern about a hijacking trial in the United States Court for Berlin in 1979, over which he presided.

From the end of World War II in Europe in May 1945 until the reunification of Germany in October 1990, Berlin was divided into four sectors: the American Sector, the French Sector, the British Sector, and the Soviet Sector, each named after the occupying power. The Soviet sector, informally called East Berlin, was considered by East Germany, then a member of the Warsaw Pact, to be part of its territory and in fact its capital, and the American, French, and British Sectors, collectively called West Berlin, were in some respects governed as if they were a part of West Germany, a member of NATO. Seldom did the American government exercise power directly in the American sector, except as it affected American military forces stationed in Berlin. In particular, the judgeship of the United States Court for Berlin was vacant except during the trial over which Judge Stern presided.

In 1978, after prodigious diplomatic efforts, NATO had convinced the Warsaw Pact states to sign an international convention on hijacking, in which each signatory state promised to punish hijackers who landed in their territory.

On 30 August 1978, Hans Detlef Alexander Tiede and Ingrid Ruske, both East Germans, used a starting pistol (not an actual gun) to hijack a Polish passenger aircraft (LOT Polish Airlines Flight 165) from Gdańsk bound for East Berlin's Schönefeld Airport and diverted it instead to the U.S. Air Force base at Tempelhof Airport in West Berlin. The West German government was very reluctant to prosecute Tiede and Ruske because of the West German policy of supporting the right of East Germans to flee oppression in the GDR. However, the NATO members did not want to lose the hijacking treaty on which they had worked for so long. Consequently, the case was prosecuted in the never-before-convened United States Court for Berlin.

Over the prosecutor's objections, Judge Stern ruled that the defendants were entitled to be tried by a jury, a procedure abolished in Germany in 1924. The case against Tiede's co-defendant Ingrid Ruske was dismissed because she had not been notified of her Miranda rights before signing a confession. Tiede was acquitted on three charges, including hijacking and possession of a firearm, but convicted of taking a hostage. He was sentenced to time served — about nine months.

A significant subtext in the book is Stern's refusal to accept assertions made by representatives of the United States Department of State that, as the authority appointing the judge for the United States Court for Berlin, it also had the right to control the judge's decision, i.e., tell Stern what to decide. The "time served" sentence, writes Stern, was the only method by which he could protect Tiede from the State Department. Not surprisingly, the State Department and the U.S. Mission to Berlin had a different view of the facts and circumstances, Mark Feldman Oral History at p. 126, https://adst.org/OH%20TOCs/Feldman.Mark.pdf

In 1988, Stern's book became the basis of a movie with the same name that starred Martin Sheen as Judge Stern, Harris Yulin as Bruno Ristau, and Sean Penn as Witness X.