Введите слово или словосочетание на любом языке 👆
Язык:
Перевод и анализ слов искусственным интеллектом ChatGPT
На этой странице Вы можете получить подробный анализ слова или словосочетания, произведенный с помощью лучшей на сегодняшний день технологии искусственного интеллекта:
- как употребляется слово
- частота употребления
- используется оно чаще в устной или письменной речи
- варианты перевода слова
- примеры употребления (несколько фраз с переводом)
- этимология
Что (кто) такое lacks distinction - определение
EPISTEMOLOGICAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN STATEMENTS OF FACT (POSITIVE, DESCRIPTIVE) BASED ON REASON AND PHYSICAL OBSERVATION AND STATEMENTS OF VALUE (NORMATIVE, PRESCRIPTIVE) ABOUT ETHICS AND AESTHETICS, STUDIED VIA AXIOLOGY
Fact-Value Distinction; Fact/value distinction; Fact/Value distinction; Fact/Value Distinction; Fact-value Distinction; Fact/value Distinction; Fact-Value distinction; Fact-value gap; Fact-value dichotomy; Fact value distinction; Fact and value; Fact-value distinction
Distinction (sociology)
.jpg?width=200)
SOCIAL PHENOMENON WHEREBY MEMBERS OF ONE SOCIAL GROUP DIFFERENTIATE THEMSELVES INTENTIONALLY OR UNINTENTIONALLY FROM MEMBERS OF OTHER SOCIAL GROUPS
Social distinction; Cultural distinction; Cultural distinctions
In sociology, distinction is a social force whereby people use various strategies—consciously or not—to differentiate and distance themselves from others in society, and to assign themselves greater value in the process. In Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (La Distinction, 1979), Pierre Bourdieu described how those in power define aesthetic concepts like "good taste", with the consequence that the social class of a person tends to predict and in fact determine his or her cultural interests, likes, and dislikes.
Essence–energies distinction
.jpg?width=200)
THEOLOGICAL CONCEPT CENTRAL TO CURRENT EASTERN ORTHODOXY
Energies of God; Essence Energies Distinction; Essence-Energies distinction; Essence–energies distinction (version 2); Essence-Energies distinction (Eastern Orthodox theology); Essence Energies distinction in Eastern Orthodox theology; Essence–Energies distinction; Essence–Energies distinction (Eastern Orthodox theology); Essence-energies distinction (Eastern Orthodox theology); Essence-energies distinction; Divine energies; Essence-energy distinction; Essence–energies distinction (Eastern Orthodox theology); Essence-energies distinction (version 2); Essence–Energies Distinction; Essence-Energies Distinction
In Palamite theology, there is a distinction between the essence (ousia) and the energies (energeia) of God. It was first formulated by Gregory Palamas (1296–1359) as part of his defense of the Athonite monastic practice of hesychasmos against the charge of heresy brought by the humanist scholar and theologian Barlaam of Calabria.
Distinction (book)
BOOK
La distinction; Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste; Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste; La Distinction; Distinction (1979 book)
Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste () is a 1979 book by Pierre Bourdieu, based upon the author's empirical research from 1963 until 1968. A sociological report about the state of French culture, Distinction was first published in English translation in 1984.
Википедия
Fact–value distinction
The fact–value distinction is a fundamental epistemological distinction described between:
- 'Statements of fact' ('positive' or 'descriptive statements'), based upon reason and physical observation, and which are examined via the empirical method.
- 'Statements of value' ('normative' or 'prescriptive statements'), which encompass ethics and aesthetics, and are studied via axiology.
This barrier between 'fact' and 'value' implies it is impossible to derive ethical claims from factual arguments, or to defend the former using the latter.
The fact–value distinction is closely related to, and derived from, the is–ought problem in moral philosophy, characterized by David Hume. The terms are often used interchangeably, though philosophical discourse concerning the is–ought problem does not usually encompass aesthetics.
