notwithstanding$53878$ - определение. Что такое notwithstanding$53878$
Diclib.com
Словарь ChatGPT
Введите слово или словосочетание на любом языке 👆
Язык:

Перевод и анализ слов искусственным интеллектом ChatGPT

На этой странице Вы можете получить подробный анализ слова или словосочетания, произведенный с помощью лучшей на сегодняшний день технологии искусственного интеллекта:

  • как употребляется слово
  • частота употребления
  • используется оно чаще в устной или письменной речи
  • варианты перевода слова
  • примеры употребления (несколько фраз с переводом)
  • этимология

Что (кто) такое notwithstanding$53878$ - определение

TYPE OF JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
Judgment non obstante veredicto; N.O.V.; Non obstante verdicto; Judgment notwithstanding the verdict; Non obstante veredicto; JNOV; Motion for judgement notwithstanding the verdict; Judgment of acquittal; Motion for acquittal

Notwithstanding         
BOOK BY LOUIS DE BERNIÈRES
Notwithstanding (novel); Notwithstanding (short story collection)
Notwithstanding is a short story collection by British author Louis de Bernières. Published in 2009, it was inspired by Wormley, the Surrey village in which he grew up during the 1960s and 1970s.
Notwithstanding         
BOOK BY LOUIS DE BERNIÈRES
Notwithstanding (novel); Notwithstanding (short story collection)
·prep Without prevention, or obstruction from or by; in spite of.
II. Notwithstanding (·adv / ·conj) Nevertheless; however; although; as, I shall go, notwithstanding it rains.
notwithstanding         
BOOK BY LOUIS DE BERNIÈRES
Notwithstanding (novel); Notwithstanding (short story collection)
¦ preposition in spite of.
¦ adverb nevertheless.
¦ conjunction although.
Origin
ME: from not + withstanding, pres. participle of withstand.

Википедия

Judgment notwithstanding verdict

Judgment notwithstanding the verdict, also called judgment non obstante veredicto, or JNOV, is a type of judgment as a matter of law that is sometimes rendered at the conclusion of a jury trial. In U.S. federal civil court cases, the term has been replaced by the renewed judgment as a matter of law, which emphasizes its relationship to the judgment as a matter of law, formerly called a directed verdict. In U.S. federal criminal cases, the term is "judgment of acquittal".

In American courts, JNOV is the practice whereby the presiding judge in a civil jury trial may overrule the decision of a jury and reverse or amend their verdict. In literal terms, the judge enters a judgment notwithstanding the jury verdict. The rarely-granted intervention permits the judge to exercise discretion to avoid extreme and unreasonable jury decisions.

A judge may not enter a JNOV of "guilty" following a jury acquittal in United States criminal cases. Such an action would violate a defendant's Fifth Amendment right not to be placed in double jeopardy and Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury. If the judge grants a motion to set aside judgment after the jury convicts, however, the action may be reversed on appeal by the prosecution.

A JNOV is appropriate only if the judge determines that no reasonable jury could have reached the given verdict. For example, if a party enters no evidence on an essential element of his case but the jury still finds in his favor, the court may rule that no reasonable jury would have disregarded the lack of evidence on that key point and reform the judgment.

The reversal of a jury's verdict by a judge occurs when the judge believes that there were insufficient facts on which to base the jury's verdict or that the verdict did not correctly apply the law. That procedure is similar to a situation in which a judge orders a jury to arrive at a particular verdict, called a directed verdict. A judgment notwithstanding the verdict is occasionally made when a jury refuses to follow a judge's instruction to arrive at a certain verdict.