of set purpose - перевод на голландский
Diclib.com
Словарь ChatGPT
Введите слово или словосочетание на любом языке 👆
Язык:

Перевод и анализ слов искусственным интеллектом ChatGPT

На этой странице Вы можете получить подробный анализ слова или словосочетания, произведенный с помощью лучшей на сегодняшний день технологии искусственного интеллекта:

  • как употребляется слово
  • частота употребления
  • используется оно чаще в устной или письменной речи
  • варианты перевода слова
  • примеры употребления (несколько фраз с переводом)
  • этимология

of set purpose - перевод на голландский

Communities of Purpose; Communities of purpose

of set purpose      
met opzet; met bepaalde bedoeling
special-purpose vehicle         
LEGAL ENTITY - USUALLY A LIMITED COMPANY OF SOME TYPE OR, SOMETIMES, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - CREATED TO FULFILL NARROW, SPECIFIC OR TEMPORARY OBJECTIVES
Special Purpose Entity; Special purpose vehicle; Special purposes entities; Special purpose company; Special purpose corporation; Single purpose vehicle; Single purpose company; Special-purpose vehicle; Single-purpose company; Singlepurpose company; Single purpose companies; Single-purpose companies; Singlepurpose companies; Single purpose entity; Single-purpose entity; Singlepurpose entity; Single purpose entities; Single-purpose entities; Singlepurpose entities; Single-purpose vehicle; Singlepurpose vehicle; Single purpose vehicles; Single-purpose vehicles; Singlepurpose vehicles; Specialpurpose entity; Special purpose entities; Special-purpose entities; Specialpurpose entities; Special-purpose company; Specialpurpose company; Special purpose companies; Special-purpose companies; Specialpurpose companies; Specialpurpose vehicle; Special purpose vehicles; Special-purpose vehicles; Specialpurpose vehicles; Special Purpose Vehicle; Financial vehicle corporation; Structured finance vehicles; Special purpose entity; Special-Purpose Vehicle
transportvoertuig voor verrichten van specifieke doelen
set theory         
  • [[Georg Cantor]]
BRANCH OF MATHEMATICS THAT STUDIES SETS, WHICH ARE COLLECTIONS OF OBJECTS
Axiomatic Set Theory; SetTheory; Set Theory; Formal set theory; Axiomatic set theory; Theory of sets; Ordinary set theory; Set theorist; Classical set theory; Set-theoretic; Axioms of set theory; Axiom of set theory; Axiomatic set theories; Transfinite set theory; Abstract set theory; Mathematical set theory; Set theory (mathematics); Applications of set theory; History of set theory
wet van groepen (richting in de wiskunde die zich bezighoudt met zinsomschrijvingen betreffende groepen en hun bewijs)

Определение

axiomatic set theory
<theory> One of several approaches to set theory, consisting of a formal language for talking about sets and a collection of axioms describing how they behave. There are many different axiomatisations for set theory. Each takes a slightly different approach to the problem of finding a theory that captures as much as possible of the intuitive idea of what a set is, while avoiding the paradoxes that result from accepting all of it, the most famous being Russell's paradox. The main source of trouble in naive set theory is the idea that you can specify a set by saying whether each object in the universe is in the "set" or not. Accordingly, the most important differences between different axiomatisations of set theory concern the restrictions they place on this idea (known as "comprehension"). Zermelo Frankel set theory, the most commonly used axiomatisation, gets round it by (in effect) saying that you can only use this principle to define subsets of existing sets. NBG (von Neumann-Bernays-Goedel) set theory sort of allows comprehension for all formulae without restriction, but distinguishes between two kinds of set, so that the sets produced by applying comprehension are only second-class sets. NBG is exactly as powerful as ZF, in the sense that any statement that can be formalised in both theories is a theorem of ZF if and only if it is a theorem of ZFC. MK (Morse-Kelley) set theory is a strengthened version of NBG, with a simpler axiom system. It is strictly stronger than NBG, and it is possible that NBG might be consistent but MK inconsistent. NF (http://math.boisestate.edu/axiomatic set theoryholmes/holmes/nf.html) ("New Foundations"), a theory developed by Willard Van Orman Quine, places a very different restriction on comprehension: it only works when the formula describing the membership condition for your putative set is "stratified", which means that it could be made to make sense if you worked in a system where every set had a level attached to it, so that a level-n set could only be a member of sets of level n+1. (This doesn't mean that there are actually levels attached to sets in NF). NF is very different from ZF; for instance, in NF the universe is a set (which it isn't in ZF, because the whole point of ZF is that it forbids sets that are "too large"), and it can be proved that the Axiom of Choice is false in NF! ML ("Modern Logic") is to NF as NBG is to ZF. (Its name derives from the title of the book in which Quine introduced an early, defective, form of it). It is stronger than ZF (it can prove things that ZF can't), but if NF is consistent then ML is too. (2003-09-21)

Википедия

Community of purpose

A community of purpose is a community of people who are going through the same process or journey to achieve a similar, often emergent, objective.

From user-generated reviews or collaborative filtering on a site such as Amazon.com which help people decide what to buy to the reputation system at eBay which gives users a sense of who they're dealing with before they transact, the community fuels collective accomplishment. The impact of a given community of purpose is directly proportional to the potential of its participants to get something done. To achieve impact, communities need the right scale (number of participants), the right level of engagement (participation and involvement) and the right collective capability in relation to the declared 'purpose' of the community. Effective communities of practice achieve a balancing act between offering the right capabilities and ensuring sufficient capacity to deliver efficiently. Communities of Purpose can address a collective need, rather than a self-interest or defined goal typical of Communities of Practice and other forms of community, and can often generate unexpected results. Consequently, true communities of purpose are often an example of a complex adaptive system, unpredictable and among the least explored community vehicles / digital or physical communities.